On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:26:11AM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 14:54 +0900, Yu Watanabe wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > > index 07f2840..1ce506a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > > @@ -522,6 +522,7 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_pstate_cpu_ids[] = {
> > > ICPU(0x2a, default_policy),
> > > ICPU(0x2d, default_policy),
> > > ICPU(0x3a, default_policy),
> > > + ICPU(0x45, default_policy),
> > > {}
> > > };
> > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, intel_pstate_cpu_ids);
> >
> > Could you apply this patch to the rawhide and f19 kernel?
>
> See https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60211 for more on this.
> But the follow up at
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cpufreq/11228 suggests that
> that patch (which adds this CPU ID and a few more, related, CPU ID's)
> needs more testing, apparently by Intel engineers.
>
> So, while this is not my call, it seems you'll have to wait until this
> CPU ID is added to mainline.
Correct.
josh
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
