Re: kernel.spec: is "Requires: initscripts" really needed?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Kay Sievers (kay@xxxxxxxx) said:
>> when installing a kernel in a minimal system, it pulls in
>> a bunch of otherwise not needed packages, because
>> initscripts.rpm has a dependency on them. Any specific
>> reason to keep that, or can we possibly drop it?
>
> The dependency was added for mkkerneldoth back in the day. If you remember
> what that was, good for you.

Long before my time, I guess.

> So, in general, it's not needed.

Cool, so we can drop it.

> Building a minimal system solely from RPM dependnecies might have
> interesting results if you left initscripts out, though - it's the vector by
> which many other things are pulled into/kept in the minimal installs by way
> of dependnecies, most of which you'd still want there:
> - procps-ng
> - kmod
> - fedora-release
> - util-linux (!)
> - findutils

Yeah, what we usually do is:
  systemd passwd yum fedora-release vim-minimal

it's mentioned in systemd-nspawn(1)

> Doesn't mean there needs to be a requirement from the kernel, though.

Nice.

Thanks,
Kay
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux