Re: dkms + kmp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 09:26:38PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> This indicates that we should not be shipping dkms et all so does
> anyone know anything about the current status on this in the working
> group?

DKMS is a framework for rebuilding modules when a new kernel is
installed.  It is primarily targeted at enterprise distributions.  If
someone wants to package and maintain it for Fedora, then I guess that's
a thing they can do.

> What our ( project ) status is in this?

Fedora the project doesn't have any status in DKMS at all.

> What the way forward is supposed to be?

Fedora's approach is to get drivers upstream and they'll naturally get
picked up when we rebase.  We don't provide or ship any pre-built
out-of-tree modules, nor do we support dkms, kmods, or any of the other
module building frameworks from a kernel perspective.  Those are
supported by the additional persons or repositories that provide them.

josh
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux