On 06/11/2013 08:44 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Me again with another comment:
>
> On 11.06.2013 16:44, harald@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Harald Hoyer <harald@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> [...]
>> -Provides: kernel-%{_target_cpu} = %{rpmversion}-%{pkg_release}%{?1:.%{1}}\
>> +Provides: kernel-%{_target_cpu} = %{rpmversion}-%{pkg_release}%{?1:-%{1}}\
>
> Is it really wise to use a "-" here? You can not have a "-" in either
> %{version} or %{release}, to afaics make sure everything can parse a rpm
> nvr from right to left: %{version} is between second rightmost dash and
> the rightmost dash; %{release} follows the rightmost dash.
>
> I'm sure you tested it, so I assume rpm doesn't enforce this rule to
> virtual provides. But something tells me this might create more problems
> then is solves. Did anyone ask the rpm and yum guys if this is a good idea?
>
> Cu
> knurd
>
Talked to the rpm guys, and yes, it's a problem.
So, any idea for a good separation char here?
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
