On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 04:38:43PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > FYI, I've just done the same thing in f18 during the 3.9 rebase. > > > > I don't see us pushing this out until 3.9.1 lands, but please sort out the > > > > config options there too. > > > > > > Thanks, I'll look at it now, for <= F-18 we still support v5tel so I > > > need to deal with that. > > > > > > Any idea on eta for 3.9.1? > > > > Probably sometime this week I would guess. There's already over a hundred > > patches queued on Linux-stable for 3.9 > > > > Greg typically seems to wait until Linus tags rc1, so whenever the merge > > window closes, you can probably expect 3.9.1 to land pretty soon afterwards. > > I'm kinda hesitant on that plan. We seem to always pull in some > patches from -rc1 that wind up being broken and fixed with a later RC, > or reverted outright. Of course, there isn't a great answer there but > maybe we can bump the karma requirement up when the update is filed? Works for me. For 17 we can delay a little longer too (at least while 3.8.x updates are still going out) if we want to be extra safe, and rebase once we get to 3.9.2 or 3.9.3 Dave _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
