On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 15:23 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > It seems pretty clear from these numbers that slub_debug is the biggest > offender for me, according to jwb. I didn't put the results in the chart > for some reason, but on the nouveau machine just like the intel one, > rc5.git1 with slub_debug=- as a kernel parameter gives a fast gtkperf > time - in the 2.4-2.5 range - and 'feels' perfectly fine, that's what > I'm running right now. One thing I should have noted, I think, now I read the mails and see that other options seem to cause I/O sluggishness for other testers: the box I'm using has 16GB of RAM and an SSD. So it's quite likely that I wouldn't perceive I/O sluggishness in regular use unless it got _really_ bad. So my results don't necessarily contradict other people's findings of I/O sluggishness in relation to options other than slub_debug. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
