3.8.0-0.rc4.git4.1.fc19.x86_64 seems ok so far.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: 3.8.0-0.rc4.git4.1.fc19.x86_64 seems ok so far.
From: Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:31:51 -0700
Delivered-to: kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1358976955.29854.4.camel@fedora64.linuxtx.org>
Organization: Scrye, INC

3.8.0-0.rc4.git4.1.fc19.x86_64 booted seems reasonably responsive so
far. 

No massive slowdowns. 

kevin

_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 3.8.0-0.rc4.git4.1.fc19.x86_64 seems ok so far.
  - From: Bruno Wolff III
- Re: 3.8.0-0.rc4.git4.1.fc19.x86_64 seems ok so far.
  - From: Josh Boyer

References:
- 3.8.0-0.rc4.git3.1.fc19 (spin lock debug on) seemed OK
  - From: Bruno Wolff III
- Re: 3.8.0-0.rc4.git3.1.fc19 (spin lock debug on) seemed OK
  - From: Josh Boyer
- Re: 3.8.0-0.rc4.git3.1.fc19 (spin lock debug on) seemed OK
  - From: Kevin Fenzi
- Re: 3.8.0-0.rc4.git3.1.fc19 (spin lock debug on) seemed OK
  - From: Justin M. Forbes

Prev by Date: Re: 3.8.0-0.rc4.git3.1.fc19 (spin lock debug on) seemed OK
Next by Date: Re: 3.8.0-0.rc4.git4.1.fc19.x86_64 seems ok so far.
Previous by thread: Re: 3.8.0-0.rc4.git3.1.fc19 (spin lock debug on) seemed OK
Next by thread: Re: 3.8.0-0.rc4.git4.1.fc19.x86_64 seems ok so far.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora General Discussion] [Older Fedora Users Archive] [Fedora Advisory Board] [Fedora Security] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Package Announce] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora Music] [Fedora Packaging] [Centos] [Fedora SELinux] [Coolkey] [Yum Users] [Tux] [Yosemite News] [KDE Users] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [USB] [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux