Re: CONFIG_NR_CPUS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Xose Vazquez Perez
<xose.vazquez@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ruben Kerkhof  wrote:
>
>
>> It's even higher these days:
>>
>> grep NR_CPUS /boot/config-2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64
>> CONFIG_NR_CPUS=4096
>>
>> I'm curious, has anyone measured what the memory overhead is of
>> keeping NR_CPUS at 512?
>> arch/x86/Kconfig says "This is purely to save memory - each supported
>> CPU adds approximately eight kilobytes to the kernel image." If that's
>> true, 512 cpus use 4MB, something I'm willing to live with on my 64bit
>>  servers.
>
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219457
>

Keep in mind that this bug is ~5 y/o.
The last 5 years seen an explosion in both core count and standard
memory size in servers.
(While on the other hand, a lot of progress was made to reduce the
static allocations tied to NR_CPUS)

- Gilboa
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux