Re: $(uname -p) in kernel.spec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:37 AM, DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This change breaks my arm build:
>
> 384fed00 (Dave Jones 2012-03-19 17:30:04 -0400 1485)
>
> -for i in *.config
> +for i in kernel-*-$(uname -p)*.config
>
> "uname -p" returns armv7l but the configs we use are more varied than that:
>
>        $(CFG)-arm.config  $(CFG)-armv5tel.config  $(CFG)-armv7hl.config \
>        $(CFG)-armv5tel-kirkwood.config \
>        $(CFG)-armv7l-imx.config $(CFG)-armv7l-omap.config \
>        $(CFG)-armv7l-tegra.config $(CFG)-armv7l-highbank.config \
>        $(CFG)-armv7hl-imx.config $(CFG)-armv7hl-omap.config \
>        $(CFG)-armv7hl-tegra.config $(CFG)-armv7hl-highbank.config \
>
> Typically, we use "rpmbuild --target=armv7hl" to specify the platform
> to build for, do we need to change the way we're doing things?  Is
> --target no longer supported?

This change seems to be in the kernel.spec and not in any of the
scripts. I wonder if %_target_cpu should not be used instead?

Cheers,
Niels
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux