Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 29s! [X:811] (70 lines?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:03:07PM +0000, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Can someone point me to the correct kernel component for bz.
> Abrt added me to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713687
> 
> But that seems to be completly different.

There was a request to have abrt ignore any part of the stack trace that
started with '?' because those are guestimations by the kernel.  Before
abrt started ignoring those, it would take almost identical stack traces
and hash them differently, which was leading to a lot of duplicates.

My guess here is that because _all_ of your stack entries start with
'?', abrt didn't work quite as expected.

As for the problem itself, soft lockups inside of virtual guests seem to
be somewhat of a norm these days.  There is work on-going to get the
host and the KVM guest talk to each other in this regard.  See bug

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794478

josh
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux