Re: Future kernel version number for F-15

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 09:11:54PM -0500, Josh Stone wrote:
 > On 01/11/2012 06:27 PM, Nicolas Viéville wrote:
 > >> Didn't Chuck change it so LINUX_VERSION_CODE always calls itself 3.x
 > >> now?  If so, then you shouldn't need any cpp to consider 2.6.4x, as
 > >> that's only for the utsname.
 > > 
 > > If I understand correctly what you mean, this macro (on one line)
 > > 
 > > #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(3, 2, 0) || (LINUX_VERSION_CODE
 > >> = KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 42) && LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(3, 0,
 > > 0))
 > > 
 > > would be equivalent and have the same behavior of this one
 > > 
 > > #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(3, 2, 0)
 > > 
 > > in F-15 as in F-16?
 > 
 > Yes, that should work.  That change was made starting in the 2.6.41.3-1
 > package to leave LINUX_VERSION_CODE as the real 3.x version.

Right. If this doesn't work, let us know.

	Dave
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux