Re: [RFC] kernel.spec: reverse dependency logic for moving packages between kernel and kernel-modules-extra

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 01:13:33PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 01:02:03PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:

> > I don't think I'm very fond of the kernel-modules-extra package.
> > But if it is going to be around, it needs to process the dependencies
> > in a way that doesn't require both modules to be installed all the
> > time. :-)
> 
> Honestly, we might want to just call depmod to work out _all_ the
> dependencies, then parse modules.dep and move everything once.  Playing
> games either way is just going to play shell games moving a module
> around.

Honestly, I still think that has it backwards.  If a module is
important enough to stay in kernel (e.g. a hardware device driver),
then dependency on a module that was slated for extras shouldn't pull
the more important module over there -- it should pull the "extra"
module back to kernel instead.

John
-- 
John W. Linville		The water won't run clean until you get
linville@xxxxxxxxxx			the pigs out of the creek.
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux