On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 08:19:07PM +0100, Brendan Jones wrote: > > Hi > > I know you guys follow upstream pretty closely, but under what > circumstances would Fedora consider applying a patch to the kernel which > might be not be in the current merge tree? For context I give you this one? > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=131973404328622 It's acked by one of the USB maintainers, so that goes a long way. > Mostly I'm curious, I'll be applying it local anyway I saw a bug comment go flying by pointing to this same patch, but I can't recall what bug it was. Did you point to this in a bug, if so which one? Since you're applying it locally, I'm wondering if you can let us know if it solves that particular bug. josh _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
