Hi,
2011/7/15 Lucas <macachuto@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Dear All.
>
> Just updated and got the following in dmesg:
It looks like a kernel bug.
>
>
>
> [ 37.653381] =============================================
> [ 37.654015] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> [ 37.654015] 3.0-0.rc7.git0.1.fc16.i686 #1
> [ 37.654015] ---------------------------------------------
> [ 37.654015] systemd-logind/651 is trying to acquire lock:
> [ 37.654015] (&ep->mtx){+.+.+.}, at: [<c05285f1>] ep_scan_ready_list+0x32/0x154
> [ 37.654015]
> [ 37.654015] but task is already holding lock:
> [ 37.654015] (&ep->mtx){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0528a90>] sys_epoll_ctl+0x103/0x481
> [ 37.654015]
> [ 37.654015] other info that might help us debug this:
> [ 37.654015] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
> [ 37.654015]
> [ 37.654015] CPU0
> [ 37.654015] ----
> [ 37.654015] lock(&ep->mtx);
> [ 37.654015] lock(&ep->mtx);
> [ 37.654015]
> [ 37.654015] *** DEADLOCK ***
> [ 37.654015]
> [ 37.654015] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
> [ 37.654015]
> [ 37.654015] 2 locks held by systemd-logind/651:
> [ 37.654015] #0: (epmutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0528a4b>] sys_epoll_ctl+0xbe/0x481
> [ 37.654015] #1: (&ep->mtx){+.+.+.}, at: [<c0528a90>] sys_epoll_ctl+0x103/0x481
> [ 37.654015]
> [ 37.654015] stack backtrace:
> [ 37.654015] Pid: 651, comm: systemd-logind Not tainted 3.0-0.rc7.git0.1.fc16.i686 #1
> [ 37.654015] Call Trace:
> [ 37.654015] [<c08490fe>] ? printk+0x2d/0x2f
> [ 37.654015] [<c046b2ef>] __lock_acquire+0x811/0xb63
> [ 37.654015] [<c0407c77>] ? sched_clock+0x8/0xb
> [ 37.654015] [<c045d190>] ? sched_clock_local+0x10/0x18b
> [ 37.654015] [<c05285f1>] ? ep_scan_ready_list+0x32/0x154
> [ 37.654015] [<c046ba5e>] lock_acquire+0xad/0xe4
> [ 37.654015] [<c05285f1>] ? ep_scan_ready_list+0x32/0x154
> [ 37.654015] [<c08506bd>] __mutex_lock_common+0x49/0x2ee
> [ 37.654015] [<c05285f1>] ? ep_scan_ready_list+0x32/0x154
> [ 37.654015] [<c04332e6>] ? __might_sleep+0x29/0xfb
> [ 37.654015] [<c046a912>] ? mark_lock+0x26/0x1f2
> [ 37.654015] [<c0850a7c>] mutex_lock_nested+0x43/0x49
> [ 37.654015] [<c05285f1>] ? ep_scan_ready_list+0x32/0x154
> [ 37.654015] [<c05285f1>] ep_scan_ready_list+0x32/0x154
> [ 37.654015] [<c05281cb>] ? ep_remove+0x9b/0x9b
> [ 37.654015] [<c0528727>] ep_poll_readyevents_proc+0x14/0x16
> [ 37.654015] [<c05283d6>] ep_call_nested.constprop.2+0x6d/0x9a
> [ 37.654015] [<c0528713>] ? ep_scan_ready_list+0x154/0x154
> [ 37.654015] [<c05284d2>] ep_eventpoll_poll+0x45/0x55
> [ 37.654015] [<c0528b8c>] sys_epoll_ctl+0x1ff/0x481
> [ 37.654015] [<c05282fb>] ? ep_send_events_proc+0xd5/0xd5
> [ 37.654015] [<c08521ac>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
--
Best regards,
Michal
http://eventhorizon.pl/
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
