Re: [PATCH] Make IPv6 built-in.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, Jun 07 2011, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>> So, we can either be slightly fatter and guarantee that IPv6 works
>> predictably, or stay thin and have erratic behavior. I still think this
>> is a good decision.
>
> My smallest box is 512 MB, so I'm ok. Also, it's a 32-bit Atom, so I use
> about 30%, 40% less RAM than Bill (hashes and tables got lots of pointers
> maybe?). Just wondering what Smolt says, what's the median RAM size?
> Will OLPC people hate us?

We aren't using your kernel source at the moment (a few stubborn patches
not upstreamed yet), and if we were we'd have a separate kernel config,
so it's all good; +1 from OLPC.

Thanks,

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux