Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:35:55PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > >> Ah, ok. The point is that we can't support every target yet[0] and are >> focusing e.g. on OMAP3/4 (BeagleBoard and PandaBoard) in the test kernel >> available so far. For everyone else, it's desired to have something that >> satisfies RPM about kernel deps and allows things like dracut to >> install. All of this works great once the fake deps are in place - I've >> a system booting with root encrypted LVM with dracut on F13 for example, >> but the kernel itself is for Freescale iMX5 and not in RPM format yet. > > So why not provide the fake-kernel package from the kernel SRPM you do > have? If you have your own non-mainline packages then it makes more > sense to put the hacks there than it does to put them in the mainline > distribution. Because presumably, the goal is that the ARM kernel they *do* build is built using an unmodified kernel spec. We do have ARM bits in the spec right now. -- Jarod Wilson jarod@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel