Re: 2.6.35.10-74 compilation (and build) problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Oh, I suck, I searched for DRM_NOVEAU instead of DRM_NOUVEAU.
>   
I did exactly the same as you as my French is really crap!

> Jarod figured it out.  For some reason CONFIG_STAGING needs to be set to
> 'y' for DRM_NOUVEU to be enabled for some reason.
>   
How did it work in my .34 version without CONFIG_STAGING being set then? 
Do I really need to scan through all Kconfig files in order to see what 
has/hasn't changed and then figure out what needs to be changed/added to 
the config-local file then?

The patch should be transferring my options - it doesn't, end of!

CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU is a case in point - at least I should have been 
warned what's coming! It is not just these options that haven't been 
transferred - run diff on the two files I attached and see how many 
other options have not been transferred over.

If I am supposed to check every Kconfig file in order to see what will 
be applied and what not, then I am better off ditching the bl**dy patch 
and entering everything manually - why bother otherwise?!
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux