Re: 2.6.35.10-74 compilation (and build) problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 10:31:47PM -0800, JD wrote:
> > OBJCOPY arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-sysenter.so
> > AS arch/x86/vdso/vdso32.o
> > CC arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-setup.o
> > VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-int80-syms.lds
> > VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-sysenter-syms.lds
> > VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-syms.lds
> > LD arch/x86/vdso/built-in.o
> > LD arch/x86/built-in.o
> > CC kernel/sched.o
> > kernel/sched.c: In function âinit_idleâ:
> > kernel/sched.c:5397: error: implicit declaration of function 
> > âdouble_rq_lockâ
> > kernel/sched.c:5422: error: implicit declaration of function 
> > âdouble_rq_unlockâ
> > make[1]: *** [kernel/sched.o] Error 1
> > make: *** [kernel] Error 2
> >
> I re-ran make xconfig and re-enabled SMP
> and restarted make all.
> No compilation problems.
> So, it seems that disabling SMP breaks the kernel compilation.
> This is a rather loud evidence that the kernel devs have inserted
> code (perhaps unwittingly) that is SMP dependent without proper
> ifdefs for SMP and non-SMP.

Ok, you are probably right.  File a bug at bugzilla.redhat.com

Cheers,
Don
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux