Re: 2.6.35.10-74 compilation (and build) problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 10:18:42AM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > We could probably mimic the old linux-kernel-test.patch which was a stub
> > patch to allow developers to quickly test their patches without mucking
> > with the spec file, but instead for config files (like the %rhel thing).
> 
> I think this would suffice:
> 
> # This file is empty in stock builds, but can be populated with local
> # config option overrides for custom local builds
> Source1000: config-local
> 
> 
> Then, in %prep, in a loop similar to the if rhel one:
> 
>     ./merge.pl %{SOURCE1000} $i.tmp > $i
> 
> 
> Since the file is empty in stock configs, the above in that case would
> simply be a no-op. If its populated by someone doing a local rebuild, then
> their config options get overlayed on top of the stock ones.

That is sorta what I was thinking too.

Cheers,
Don
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux