Re: 2.6.35.10-74 compilation (and build) problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 18:45 +0000, Mr Dash Four wrote:
>> That, unfortunately, cannot be said for the other
>> two [whatever] who 'participated' in this thread!
>
> Is this list monitored by the Hall Monitors (see:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Hall_Monitor_Policy )? If not, as it seems
> to be, should it be? Or should it be regulated on a case by case basis
> (and who is in a position to do so)?

Hall Monitors is dead.

josh
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux