Re: upstream exec-shield git tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 12:36:27PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:34:09PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>  > Dave, what do you think about it?
> 
> To be honest, I share Rolands apathy about the whole thing.
> I've not had a response about this stuff from Ingo about it, so I've pretty
> much just given up on it.  As of last month, I don't even have
> any 32-bit only boxes, so I care even less about any of this than
> I did before.

Well, this makes it easy! Just take all my patches. ;) Seriously, though,
I actually do care about this patchset since way too many people still have
crappy hardware or crappier BIOSes that disable NX, so I think this is
still important to keep around.

So, how about this as the current position:

 - nx-emu only has value on 32bit when NX is unavailable
 - ascii-armor only has utility when used with nx-emu

If we can agree on this, then Fedora and Ubuntu will be on the same page,
and we can share the same entire patchset (including my pending patch).

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Ubuntu Security Team
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux