Re: Comparing other distros kernels to Fedora.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 01:09:18PM +0200, Micha? Piotrowski wrote:
> > It might be a patch added by one of Fedora kernel developers. CC'ing
> > fedora-kernel
> >
>
> Honestly, there's nothing particularly relevant in F-14's kernel. Can
> you please try:
> http://kyle.fedorapeople.org/kernel/2.6.36-0.36.rc7.git3.fc15/x86_64/
>
> Which is a nodebug rawhide kernel, which is even closer to upstream than
> the F-14 2.6.35 is, and let us know if that's any more helpful?
>
> (I could swear someone was doing pre-built vanilla kernels, we should
> bring that back if not.)
>
> I've tried this kernel (sans perf) and I can suspend and resume again.
This is in f14.

Should I try this in f13?

Will this help isolate what's wrong with the 2.6.34 and 2.6.35 kernels for
my system?

I should ask, are there other fedora testers using a Dell Studio XPS 1547?


R.
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux