Re: FYI: RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8122f04f>] [<ffffffff8122f04f>] cfq_free_io_context+0x18/0x34

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/9/24 Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 08:58:59AM +0200, Micha? Piotrowski wrote:
>> 2010/9/23 Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> > * Roland McGrath (roland@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
>> >> That is fixed upstream in commit f362b73244fb16ea4ae127ced1467dd8adaa7733.
>> >> If that's not already queued for 2.6.35-stable, then it probably should be.
>> >
>> > It is queued for 2.6.35-stable
>> >
>>
>> Ok, thanks.
>>
>> What about CFQ problem?
>>
>
> I looked at that on Monday, but haven't found it yet.

So it is a known problem. Good to know.

Regards,
Michal
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux