Re: performance testing rawhide.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 13:27 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>> There have been a bunch of requests over time to off non-debug builds
>> of the rawhide kernel for people wanting to do performance regression testing etc
>>
>> We could do this two ways.
>>
>> - The notion that was put forward was to keep 'kernel' as being debug mode,
>>   and add a 'kernel-nodebug'. So it's sort of the inverse of the releases.
>>
>> - Stop making rawhide 'debug by default', and just start shipping kernel-debug
>>   for rawhide as we do for releases.
>>
>> The latter involves less uglification of the spec, but we're probably going
>> to lose a lot of testing if people aren't going to be running kernel-debug
>> by default. (How many reports do we get from kernel-debug users ? Not many).
>>
>> thoughts?
>
> I'd like to see a "kernel-server" package that could be used for
> testing.

What the hell are you talking about, and what does it have to do with
what Dave asked?

I'd like to see a
kernel-embedded-ppc-without-float-but-with-ATI-KMS-module-built-in-with-ponies.
 See, I can spout random crap too.

josh
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux