Re: Assessing the Tux Strength - A security comparison bet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 11:25:31AM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote:
 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 > Hash: SHA1
 > 
 > 
 > Interesting reading, comparing the security bits between Debian, Fedora,
 > Gentoo Hardened, openSuSE and Ubuntu.
 > 
 > <http://labs.mwrinfosecurity.com/notices/security_mechanisms_in_linux_environment__part_1___userspace_memory_protection/>
 > 
 > <http://labs.mwrinfosecurity.com/notices/assessing_the_tux_strength_part_2_into_the_kernel/>

The randomisation tests are curious. Particularly, that Fedora scores
so poorly in shlib randomisation.

	Dave
 
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux