Re: Was kernel-2.6.35-0.fc14 supposed to be kernel-2.6.35-1.fc14a?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Was kernel-2.6.35-0.fc14 supposed to be kernel-2.6.35-1.fc14a?
From: Genes MailLists <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 19:55:30 -0400
Cc: kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100802032221.GA13391@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20100802023727.GA26153@xxxxxxxx> <20100802032221.GA13391@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9pre) Gecko/20100730 Lanikai/3.1.2pre

On 08/01/2010 11:22 PM, Dave Jones wrote:


   Do you plan to push this to f13 by chance?


 gene/
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Was kernel-2.6.35-0.fc14 supposed to be kernel-2.6.35-1.fc14a?
  - From: Dave Jones

References:
- Was kernel-2.6.35-0.fc14 supposed to be kernel-2.6.35-1.fc14a?
  - From: Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Was kernel-2.6.35-0.fc14 supposed to be kernel-2.6.35-1.fc14a?
  - From: Dave Jones

Prev by Date: Re: dist-git kernel
Next by Date: Re: Was kernel-2.6.35-0.fc14 supposed to be kernel-2.6.35-1.fc14a?
Previous by thread: Re: Was kernel-2.6.35-0.fc14 supposed to be kernel-2.6.35-1.fc14a?
Next by thread: Re: Was kernel-2.6.35-0.fc14 supposed to be kernel-2.6.35-1.fc14a?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora General Discussion] [Older Fedora Users Archive] [Fedora Advisory Board] [Fedora Security] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Package Announce] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora Music] [Fedora Packaging] [Centos] [Fedora SELinux] [Coolkey] [Yum Users] [Tux] [Yosemite News] [KDE Users] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [USB] [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux