On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 23:37:53 -0600 Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Greetings. > > Finally sat down to look at moving forward on the kernel bug traging > stuff (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KernelBugTriage ) > > Some more thoughts: > > Would it be useful to add tracker bugs for [PATCH] bugs? Or is that > easy enough to query for if you are looking for them? Should we ask > submitters to make sure they also submit upstream? > I've been adding Keywords: Patch, but a tracker might be better. That can mean several different things: 1) A patch to our kernel.spec file or other fedora-only thing. 2) A link to an upstream patch that fixes the bug in our kernel. 3) Something meant for upstream. > Should we have any tracker for [RFE] bugs as well? > Probably not worth the trouble. > I noticed we have: > > Bug 126342 Meta bug: custom built kernels - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=126342 > > Should we close any crazy custom kernel config issues as a duplicate of > that one? > Yes, I think that's what it's for. _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
