On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 11:32 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:44:50AM -0400, Adam Jackson escreveu:
> > On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 17:37 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > > %package -n perf
> > > Summary: Performance monitoring for the Linux kernel
> > > Group: Development/System
> > > License: GPLv2
> > > +%if %{with_perftool}
> > > +Requires: kernel-perf(%{_arch}) >= %{version}-%{release}
> > > +%endif
> >
> > Oughtn't this be:
> >
> > Requires: kernel-perf%{_isa} >= %{version}-%{release}
>
> The version-release part shouldn't be there, backward compatibility is a
> goal, so one can use an arbitrary perf binary with an arbitrary kernel.
I was more commenting that %{_arch} is x86_64 but %{_isa} is (x86-64).
Only the latter sort are automatically generated by rpm.
- ajax
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
