On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 06:31:04AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 09:43:40AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > If that known-to-build version fails to build with 4.8.1 then sure, > > we appear to have an rpm regression no matter how unlikely it should > > seems to me given the changes in 4.8.0 -> 4.8.1. But until proven > > otherwise, I'd say the kernel.spec cleanup efforts have broken the > > noarch case. It's not exactly hard to break a spec of that > > complexity :) > > > > Looking at rpm, I was inclined to agree, so I poked more. Looks like > davej's changes last week broke it somehow... I'll puzzle it out. I don't see how. The man page generation part of the spec is no different from what we have in F13. I've looked over the changes I did, and don't see anything that would trigger that failure. (not denying it caused it, it's possible I've overlooked something, but I'm just not seeing it) Dave _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
