Re: spec cleanup.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 14:24 -0400, Linda Wang wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
> > I'm thinking we can probably drop some stuff from the spec.
> > Any thoughts on these ?
> >
> > - Some of the requires/conflicts are ancient, and kinda pointless to keep around
> >   (they reach back to rhl days)
> > - We still have some xen cruft in there. We're not going to be building xen kernels
> >   from HEAD any time soon, so why bother?
> > - kdump is kind of a disaster, it's never worked in fedora afair.
> >   jarod was poking at it from a rhel context, but I doubt he has the time to maintain
> >   it fulltime in fedora.  lets just drop it all ?
> >   
> there was a side discussion to update kdump in fedora, including 
> kexec-tools..
> so we would like to keep kdump in the fedora tree if possible.

I'd like to see an existence proof of it working first.

- ajax
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux