On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:21:02AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 09:58:12PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > > Well, I asked around about that, but not sure how easy/possible it is > > > to do with our current setup. Basically bugzilla gets populated from > > > pkgdb, which has a list of packages, owners, cc people, etc. > > > > > > It doesn't have a way to say: kernel is this, and has subsystem X, Y, Z > > > > Yep, that's the answer I'd heard before too, unfortunately. > > It's a pity that the tools seem to be this inflexible. > > > > the kernel.org bugzilla is much better at this. :( > > > > There's no /particular/ reason we couldn't use the kernel.org bugzilla > for Fedora if it would improve things... the problem with using the kernel.org bz for Fedora bugs is that if they report a bug which turns out not to be a kernel bug, we can't reassign it to the right package, they need to file a new bug back at rhbz. It's sad that after all these years the only bz interoperability solution that's appeared is "use launchpad", which isn't a solution at all. Dave _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
