[mst@xxxxxxxxxx: Re: [PATCH] tun: orphan an skb on tx]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is commit 0110d6f22f392f976e84ab49da1b42f85b64a3c5 in net-2.6
Please cherry-pick this fix for F13 (in fact, it's needed for F12
as well).

----- Forwarded message from "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> -----

Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:35:57 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: stable@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
	Paul Moore <paul.moore@xxxxxx>,
	David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
	linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tun: orphan an skb on tx
Message-ID: <20100421113557.GA31606@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-Reply-To: <20100413145944.GA7716@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 05:59:44PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> The following situation was observed in the field:
> tap1 sends packets, tap2 does not consume them, as a result
> tap1 can not be closed. This happens because
> tun/tap devices can hang on to skbs undefinitely.
> 
> As noted by Herbert, possible solutions include a timeout followed by a
> copy/change of ownership of the skb, or always copying/changing
> ownership if we're going into a hostile device.
> 
> This patch implements the second approach.
> 
> Note: one issue still remaining is that since skbs
> keep reference to tun socket and tun socket has a
> reference to tun device, we won't flush backlog,
> instead simply waiting for all skbs to get transmitted.
> At least this is not user-triggerable, and
> this was not reported in practice, my assumption is
> other devices besides tap complete an skb
> within finite time after it has been queued.
> 
> A possible solution for the second issue
> would not to have socket reference the device,
> instead, implement dev->destructor for tun, and
> wait for all skbs to complete there, but this
> needs some thought, probably too risky for 2.6.34.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Yan Vugenfirer <yvugenfi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
> 
> Please review the below, and consider for 2.6.34,
> and stable trees.
> 
>  drivers/net/tun.c |    4 ++++
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index 96c39bd..4326520 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -387,6 +387,10 @@ static netdev_tx_t tun_net_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Orphan the skb - required as we might hang on to it
> +	 * for indefinite time. */
> +	skb_orphan(skb);
> +
>  	/* Enqueue packet */
>  	skb_queue_tail(&tun->socket.sk->sk_receive_queue, skb);
>  	dev->trans_start = jiffies;
> -- 
> 1.7.0.2.280.gc6f05

This is commit 0110d6f22f392f976e84ab49da1b42f85b64a3c5 in net-2.6
Please cherry-pick this fix in stable kernels (2.6.32 and 2.6.33).

Thanks!

-- 
MST

----- End forwarded message -----
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux