Re: RFC: re-enable auto loading of floppy driver when the PNP info says there is a floppy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 09:51:20PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Wrong, except for laptops until very recently every single standard machine sold
> came with a floppy drive. In the university where I used to work all new machines
> came with a ... floppy. That is all 2000 of them.
>
> Where are your numbers, statements like EVERYONE and NOBODY really are quite
> meaningless without some solid numbers to back them up.
>

Alright, whatever. I have no interest in arguing this.

>> PNP only reports the presence of the controller, not
>> the drive.
>>
>
> Wrong again, on most machines the presence of the PNP0700 id in the PNP data
> depends on the setting of the floppy drive type in the BIOS, set it to None
> and PNP0700 id goes away.
>

No, it's just like everything else. This is how the BIOS /should/ work,
theory and practice are seldom similar. This bit Dave, and it bit me on
all my machines, across a variety of vendors.

> Erm, you *completely* failed to respond to my upstream argument, if this is
> as clear cut a decision as you make it, why don't you take it upstream ?
>
> This whole discussion really is quite simply, there are 3 options here:
>
> 1) floppy driver autoloading on pnp info is a bad idea ->
>    take it upstream
>
> 2) this is a gray area ->
>    let not deviate from upstream, discuss upstream
>

Upstream is irrelevant. They don't make an OS, we do.

> 3) floppy driver autoloading is fine, people with problems need
>    to be educated to properly configure their BIOS
>

This is ridiculous.

> Also note that anaconda is autoloading the floppy driver on every install,
> so if it would really be the cause of a lot of problems, we (the anaconda
> team) would have been overwhelmed by bug reports about this by now, which
> surprise, surprise we are not.
>

The issue is that probing the controller with no drives attached causes
extremely long boot delays. That's why we removed the module aliases.

regards, Kyle
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux