Re: CONFIG_INTEL_TXT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:39:53 +0100
Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Don't forget to mention the more paranoid hand-waving about removing
> RAM chips at runtime with liquid nitrogen after going into suspend and
> hax0ring. I think there will be more upstream discussion anyway.

I'm sorry but this argument makes no sense whatsoever.

Claiming that a feature should not be enabled because someone is talking
about a mythical attack that is waaay outside the scope of what a
technology wants to protect is not solid reasoning, it's fear mongering
instead.


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux