On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 18:48 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:27:40PM +0100, Quentin Armitage wrote: > > Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com> wrote: > > > The proposal to have the baseline be i686 + SSE2 was shot down; bare > > > i686 was approved. > > > > Does this mean that an i686 kernel without PAE will still be built (my > > laptop processor does not have PAE so I am rather interested)? > > yes > > > I note > > that the latest build on Koji has not built an i686 without PAE version, > > and the comments against kernel.spec revision 1.1639 suggests there > > won't be a non-PAE kernel. On the other hand, revision 1.1640 references > > Source31: config-i686, although I don't see that file in CVS. > > screwup on my part. it's unnecessary. the non-PAE build is basically > just config-x86-generic. > > Dave Now there is an i686 kernel available in Rawhide, should doing a yum update update my i586 kernel to the latest i686 version? yum update shows that it will update kernel-firmware.noarch to 2.6.31-0.81.rc3.git4.fc12 and kernel-headers.i686 to 0:2.6.31-0.81.rc3.git4.fc12, but it does not update the kernel package. Indeed, if I try yum install kernel-2.6.31-0.81.rc3.git4.fc12.i686.rpm, yum reports: kernel-2.6.31-0.81.rc3.git4.fc12.i686.rpm: does not update installed package. Quentin _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
