Re: Switching Fedora to pae kernel by default?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:36:08PM -0500, Neil Horman wrote:
> Absolutely, I've got a Thinkpad T42 here that does just fine on fedora 10.
> Unless of course, I try to load a PAE enabled kernel on it.
> 
> I've not looked into it at all, but this thread got me thinking, is there any
> particular reason that we can't merge the pae and non-pae kernels using the same
> alternatives approach we used to merge smp & up?
> 

I looked into this several years ago, it's actually fairly gnarly since
depending on PAE we set up the swapper page tables differently, and
other ugly differences.

I should resurrect the patch set, though I think rationalizing it with the
Xen merge might be more pain than it's worth... last time I looked at it
there was a ridiculous amount of rejects.

It was pretty close to booting (though I had to hack the bootloader to
get a PAE enable bit so people without the bit could turn it off.)

regards, Kyle

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux