Re: [PATCH] build in microcode driver on x86

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 01:17:38PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
 > It doesn't really gain anything from being static, aside from requiring
 > odd udev rules and/or init scripts to load it.

We had this discussion yesterday on irc, but I never really got this in my head.

It works ok with microcode.dat, but what happens if Intel release
an update in /lib/firmware/intel-ucode/$f-$m-$s format ?

The driver will do a request_firmware, but if we build the driver in,
we'll be in the initrd, where that file won't exist.
To make it work, we'll either have to..

- have the firmware in the initramfs

or 

- pretend the request_firmware didn't happen, and have the initscript
  continue to do the microcode_ctl

Which direction are we moving in ?

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux