On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 04:38:38PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> execshield rebased against 2.6.28, merged by git and then fixed up
> by hand.
>
> build tested against x86-64 and pae/non-pae i386.
>
> i'm uploading a scratch srpm but it will take a damned long time to
> upload so i'll include the build id in a reply.
interdiff choked, so I moved your diff over the current one
and cvs diff'd, which coped a little better, but it still isn't
too easy to see the delta. It's times like this I wish we
did have a git tree.
The only bits that jumped out at me were..
@@ -151,100 +312,103 @@ index a7d50a5..86e35cb 100644
+ * we won't hit this branch next time around.
+ */
+ if (print_fatal_signals >= 2) {
-+ printk(KERN_ERR "#GPF fixup (%ld[seg:%lx]) at %08lx, CPU#%d.\n",
++ printk(KERN_ERR "#GFP fixup (%ld[seg:%lx]) at %08lx, CPU#%d.\n",
+ error_code, error_code/8, regs->ip, smp_processor_id());
It's a "general protection fault", so this seems wrong.
+ if (print_fatal_signals) {
-+ printk(KERN_ERR "#GPF(%ld[seg:%lx]) at %08lx, CPU#%d.\n", error_code,
-+ error_code/8, regs->ip, smp_processor_id());
++ printk(KERN_ERR "#GFP(%ld[seg:%lx]) at %08lx, CPU#%d.\n",
++ error_code, error_code/8, regs->ip, smp_processor_id());
ditto.
The rest of the interdiff makes my head hurt right now.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
