Re: patch naming scheme.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 15:01 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> For a while, diffs in the Fedora kernel have followed the form
> 
> linux-2.6-*.patch
> 
> Then, we started seeing some git snapshots show up as
> 
> git-*.diff
> 
> and lately, everything seems to have gone bananas, with no
> particular scheme at all..
> 
> nvidia-agp.patch, percpu_counter_sum_cleanup.patch, xfs-barrier-fix.patch
> etc etc.
> 
> Maybe I'm being overly anal.  The linux-2.6- prefix is kind of pointless
> (given that duh, they're all going to be against Linux 2.6), but it
> does group things nicely in an ls output if nothing else.
> 
> So, what are peoples thoughts on this?

The linux-2.6 thing groups nicely for ls, but make tab complete a waste
of time, and is pretty pointless as you say.

nvidia-agp I apologise for, it just came with that name from upstream, I
meant to rename it to at least agp-nvidia.

I don't suppose we could use a subdirectory called patches if we want to
keep ls clean.. this being the 21st century :)

Dave.

> 
> 	Dave
> 

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux