Re: de-modularising for the win!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 01:25:50PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
 > Dave Jones (davej@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
 > > On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 11:25:49AM -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
 > >  > Bill Nottingham wrote:
 > >  > > See various and sundry plumber's conf discussions.
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > Comments? (The netfilter stuff needs further investigation.)
 > >  > 
 > >  > Also, please add these, since they're nearly always loaded (patch is on
 > >  > top of yours):
 > > 
 > > I think this makes sense to do now as a stop-gap, but one day,
 > > I hope we can get to a situation where we do modprobe of such
 > > things based on a config file instead of always doing it. 
 > 
 > Ideally the DM layer would be able to request_module() the map type
 > whenever necessary.

Wherever possible, yes that would be even better.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux