On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 06:53:55AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Subject: Re: de-modularising for the win! > Message-ID: <20080920105355.GA6663@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > References: <20080918191355.GA9683@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48D2D94E.2020902@xxxxxxxxxx> <20080918231301.GA4734@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1221790735.15361.152.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > In-Reply-To: <1221790735.15361.152.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) > > Jeremy Katz (katzj@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 16:13 -0700, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > - killing the initrd for that general 90% case can be a big win > > > > Ermm, the general 90% (or some large-ish generalizing percentage) are > > set up to use LVM. Which then requires an initrd. > > Yes, but ... LVM is overkill, in general. (That's another discussion.) > > On further consideration, though, the biggest issue with kicking out > the initrd is getting the policy lodaed. > But, won't we all be using btrfs instead of lvm in F11? ;-) _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
