Re: de-modularising for the win!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 04:27:50PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:

 > This _is_ Fedora we're talking about, not RHEL, right? :-)
 > /me has had to replace way too many kernel modules from RHEL, which
 > can't be done if it's built-in.

The thing is, Dell or any other vendor having to ship their
own module is to me a sign of a failing in the RHEL process that we
can't get fastpath pre-next-U release packages out fast enough.
THAT should be fixed rather than holding back Fedora
(or even RHEL, as it would be a shame that it couldn't take
 advantage of these wins)

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux