On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 00:39 +0100, Christopher Brown wrote: > 2008/8/7 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx>: > > On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 23:01 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> http://jwboyer.fedorapeople.org/pub/ > >> > >> Let the kernel installs begin. > >> > >> Hopefully I didn't fsck something up horridly. If I did, then I'll fix > >> it for -rc2. > > > > Updated to -rc2 builds now. And the kernel-firmware Requires issue > > should be fixed up thanks to Jarod. > > It looks all good from here. I'll be posting a diff of the vanilla and > ummm ... blueberry ... dmesg in a moment. Any caveats, gotchas, test > suites? As for gotchas, well, it's a -rc2 kernel so be warned. But the same is true of rawhide in general. My current plan is to only do vanilla builds for -rc and final releases, unless a particular -rc is really badly broken and a git snapshot fixes quite a bit. A few caveats below. The intention isn't to provide an "alternative" kernel. It's more for those that want to test something and see if it works on vanilla as opposed to a patched Fedora kernel. That should be quite rare, as the Fedora kernels are fairly top notch and don't differ much from vanilla anyway. I'm sure some will use it as a "primary" kernel, but they should realize there is no support for these and the likely response will be "try rawhide" and/or "please report it to the Linux kernel mailing list". Also, due to quota limitations I can really only host one kernel version at a time. That means as soon as -rc3 comes out, the current builds are replaced. As for test suites, I'm not aware of any except those that are already available for any kernel such as LTP or the various benchmarks. josh _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
