On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:31:33PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:26:10PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > > > We could put it in fedora but it's not upstream and nobody can say when or if > > it will go in. > > After the long drawn out pain that utrace has been, I'm somewhat reluctant. > Especially for something that's providing additional userspace interfaces > that aren't upstream. > Perfmon adds a ridiculous number of syscalls, which means we *really* shouldn't merge it until they're reserved upstream, otherwise backwards compat woes will ensue. However, perfmon doesn't look like it is anywhere near being merged in the current form, so I'd rate it as unlikely upstream will reserve 10+ syscall entrypoints for it... NAK from me... cheers, Kyle _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
