On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Peter Jones wrote: > Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > Does a CONFIG_SMP=n kernel boot okay with EFI? I'd expect it to > > suffer from the same problem, and it just hasn't been tried because > > you've got 2 or more cores on those machines? But confirmation or > > denial would be interesting. > > Well, it hasn't been tried with CONFIG_SMP=n simply because in Fedora we > haven't been building uniprocessor kernels since SMP alternatives came about. Right. > > I've got my fingers crossed: please let us know, thanks. > > > > Hugh > > > > --- 2.6.26-rc8/arch/x86/kernel/efi_32.c 2008-04-17 03:49:44.000000000 > > +0100 > > +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/efi_32.c 2008-07-02 17:02:36.000000000 +0100 > [...] > > The inline patch works, thanks! Oh, that's good news, thank you! I'll write a better description and send it off to Linus and Ingo for 2.6.26 now. I'll say "Fedora reports..." and say "Tested-by: Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx>", would that be appropriate? Hugh _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
