Re: Firmware

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 15:48 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 10:46 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> > Another issue that we never really solved was that we really need to
> > have one firmware package per firmware (group) so that others can
> > possibly override their firmware without replacing the entire
> > kernel-firmware package and affecting everyone. Opinion?
> 
> Later. We can't do it now, and it's not a loss. What we're doing makes
> it _easier_ to do that later, if we want to. But I don't want to try it
> now.

K. I guess I'm just raising it so we're aware of it. It's not exactly a
loss, but my fear is that once we make it possible for someone else to
replace all the kernel firmware just to update their buggy one, then
they'll rush out and do this as soon as possible :)

Jon.


_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux