Re: kernel posttrans and preun hooks for other packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 09:49 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:

> ok, new-kernel-pkg grows a --rpmposttrans mode then to call these
> hooks, and we add a %posttrans to each kernel RPM.

This looks to be working fine, but let me see if I've got this
straight ...

> +%define kernel_variant_posttrans(s:r:v:) \
> +%{expand:%%posttrans %{?-v*}}\
...
>  %define kernel_variant_post(s:r:v:) \
>  %{expand:%%kernel_devel_post %{?-v*}}\
> +%{expand:%%kernel_variant_posttrans %{?-v*}}\

in this case, %{?-v*} doesn't just expand to the argument to -v, but
also passes the "-v" to %kernel_variant_posttrans ?

i.e. I'd expect it to be something like:

%{expand:%%kernel_variant_posttrans %{?-v:-v %{-v*}}}\

I know spec file syntax is bizarre, but does anyone have a sensible
explanation for this behaviour?

Cheers,
Mark.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux