On Monday 31 March 2008 03:45:25 pm Roland McGrath wrote:
> I had a fix for this test-building when I went to watch some schlock TV
> last night and forgot to check on it and commit before I went to bed.
>
> This was my .spec diff. The regexp has three chars different from your
> version.
>
> +%{expand:%%global debuginfo_args %{?debuginfo_args} -p
> '/.*/%%{KVERREL}%{?1:.?%{1}}?/.*|/.*%%{KVERREL}%{?1:.%{1}}(\.debug)?' -o
> debuginfo%{?1}.list}\ ^
Gah. Now, in your email, the ^ pointed to the ? in debuginfo%{?1}.list, while
when quoted (and rewrapped by kmail), it pointed at the ?
in %%{KVERREL}%{?1:.?%{1}}... And I'm not 100% certain which one you were
actually questioning now.
>From a later reply, looks like actually the one in debuginfo%{?1}.list, which
is necessary, so that for the base kernel, we get debuginfo.list. At least, I
think that's the case, no?
So I *think* this would do now:
%{expand:%%global debuginfo_args %{?debuginfo_args} -p '/.*/%%{KVERREL}%{?1:\.
%{1}}/.*|/.*%%{KVERREL}%{?1:\.%{1}}(\.debug)?' -o debuginfo%{?1}.list}\
Since we have the arch in all the paths as part of KVERREL, no need to worry
about paths with or without %{_target_cpu} in 'em.
--
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
