On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 13:40 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > I've put the 2.6.25 rebase of utrace back in and kicked off a build. > I'll pick up the pieces if it comes out all broken. > (It already did, cause I forgot to test the ppc32 build upstream.) > > For the moment it's applied as one big patch instead of a series. > I haven't figured out the arrangement for the new series yet. > > There is some amount of mayhem going on and this rebase was kind of hack > and slash. But there's more churn than real change. About a third of the > work is upstream now. All of the "quick and dirty" I've put together this > week is actually either what's already upstream or nearly identical to > what's been in F8 et al for a long time. So despite the late date and > general disorganization of it all, this won't be as destabilizing as it sounds. > Roland, There was an odd bug introduced by this on ia64. With your patch I get this build error: arch/ia64/kernel/entry.S: Assembler messages: arch/ia64/kernel/entry.S:723: Error: Operand 2 of `and' should be an 8-bit integer (-128-127) arch/ia64/kernel/entry.S:723: Error: qualifying predicate not followed by instruction arch/ia64/kernel/entry.S:851: Error: Operand 2 of `and' should be an 8-bit integer (-128-127) arch/ia64/kernel/entry.S:851: Error: qualifying predicate not followed by instruction This is caused by the change of #define TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK 5 to #define TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK 22 Is there a need to change this bit from 5 to 22? If that really is needed we are going to need to change entry.S to handle it (which I will need to find an ia64 asm expert for advice on this). thanks, - Doug _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
