On 24.03.2008 20:53, Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Monday 24 March 2008 03:32:37 pm Dave Jones wrote:
I took a stab at bz 197065 and arrived at the patch below.
Would appreciate some eyeballs before I commit from people
familiar with the macro goo in the specfile. (Hi Roland!)
Aparently pm-utils will need a change to cope with the changed
filename, but I think that should be the limit of the damage.
(oprofile will need to append the archname on the end of System.map-$ver
filenames, but they're user-passed anyway, and not coded anywhere afaik
Hmm. Not sure about Systemtap).
Comments?
Yep!
- install -m 644 .config $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/boot/config-$KernelVer
- install -m 644 System.map $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/boot/System.map-$KernelVer
- touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/boot/initrd-$KernelVer.img
+ install -m 644 .config $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/boot/config-$KernelVer.%{_arch}
+ install -m 644 System.map $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/boot/System.map-$KernelVer.%{_arch}
+ touch $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/boot/initrd-$KernelVer.img.%{_arch}
For the sake of consistency, [...]
For the sake of consistency we IMHO should use the same delimiter
between "$(uname -r)" and arch in all places. E.g. either "." (like
quoted above) everywhere or a "-", like we already use in the devel
packages (e.g. /usr/src/kernels/2.6.25-0.141.rc6.git5.fc9-x86_64).
CU
knurd
_______________________________________________
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
